WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:13.280 --> 00:00:16.670 align:start position:0%
 
my<00:00:14.280><c> name</c><00:00:14.430><c> is</c><00:00:14.519><c> Janelle</c><00:00:14.820><c> Lee</c><00:00:15.030><c> I</c><00:00:15.470><c> work</c><00:00:16.470><c> for</c>

00:00:16.670 --> 00:00:16.680 align:start position:0%
my name is Janelle Lee I work for
 

00:00:16.680 --> 00:00:22.540 align:start position:0%
my name is Janelle Lee I work for
workday<00:00:17.010><c> and</c><00:00:17.250><c> I</c><00:00:18.210><c> live</c><00:00:18.419><c> in</c><00:00:18.450><c> Cemetery</c>

00:00:22.540 --> 00:00:22.550 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:00:22.550 --> 00:00:28.659 align:start position:0%
 
I<00:00:25.840><c> am</c><00:00:26.840><c> on</c><00:00:27.019><c> the</c><00:00:27.050><c> prism</c><00:00:27.619><c> and</c><00:00:28.009><c> on</c><00:00:28.220><c> the</c><00:00:28.310><c> next</c><00:00:28.519><c> team</c>

00:00:28.659 --> 00:00:28.669 align:start position:0%
I am on the prism and on the next team
 

00:00:28.669 --> 00:00:30.279 align:start position:0%
I am on the prism and on the next team
that<00:00:28.970><c> worked</c><00:00:29.179><c> their</c><00:00:29.329><c> prism</c><00:00:29.689><c> analytics</c><00:00:30.140><c> team</c>

00:00:30.279 --> 00:00:30.289 align:start position:0%
that worked their prism analytics team
 

00:00:30.289 --> 00:00:33.670 align:start position:0%
that worked their prism analytics team
and<00:00:30.699><c> we're</c><00:00:31.699><c> building</c><00:00:32.029><c> a</c><00:00:32.329><c> end-to-end</c><00:00:33.050><c> solution</c>

00:00:33.670 --> 00:00:33.680 align:start position:0%
and we're building a end-to-end solution
 

00:00:33.680 --> 00:00:37.330 align:start position:0%
and we're building a end-to-end solution
for<00:00:34.629><c> customers</c><00:00:35.629><c> to</c><00:00:36.079><c> build</c><00:00:36.890><c> their</c><00:00:37.100><c> video</c>

00:00:37.330 --> 00:00:37.340 align:start position:0%
for customers to build their video
 

00:00:37.340 --> 00:00:39.310 align:start position:0%
for customers to build their video
potato<00:00:37.610><c> pipelines</c><00:00:38.000><c> it's</c><00:00:38.690><c> going</c><00:00:38.930><c> from</c><00:00:39.140><c> raw</c>

00:00:39.310 --> 00:00:39.320 align:start position:0%
potato pipelines it's going from raw
 

00:00:39.320 --> 00:00:42.160 align:start position:0%
potato pipelines it's going from raw
data<00:00:39.350><c> all</c><00:00:40.010><c> the</c><00:00:40.280><c> way</c><00:00:40.400><c> to</c><00:00:40.460><c> prepare</c><00:00:41.360><c> data</c><00:00:41.690><c> that</c>

00:00:42.160 --> 00:00:42.170 align:start position:0%
data all the way to prepare data that
 

00:00:42.170 --> 00:00:45.189 align:start position:0%
data all the way to prepare data that
you<00:00:42.290><c> can</c><00:00:42.470><c> derive</c><00:00:42.860><c> insight</c><00:00:43.280><c> from</c><00:00:43.400><c> and</c><00:00:44.199><c> the</c>

00:00:45.189 --> 00:00:45.199 align:start position:0%
you can derive insight from and the
 

00:00:45.199 --> 00:00:46.509 align:start position:0%
you can derive insight from and the
interesting<00:00:45.559><c> thing</c><00:00:45.589><c> about</c><00:00:45.800><c> this</c><00:00:46.010><c> product</c><00:00:46.250><c> is</c>

00:00:46.509 --> 00:00:46.519 align:start position:0%
interesting thing about this product is
 

00:00:46.519 --> 00:00:47.920 align:start position:0%
interesting thing about this product is
you<00:00:46.550><c> can</c><00:00:46.699><c> mingle</c><00:00:47.030><c> data</c><00:00:47.420><c> that's</c><00:00:47.780><c> inside</c>

00:00:47.920 --> 00:00:47.930 align:start position:0%
you can mingle data that's inside
 

00:00:47.930 --> 00:00:51.790 align:start position:0%
you can mingle data that's inside
workday<00:00:48.500><c> and</c><00:00:49.449><c> data</c><00:00:50.449><c> outside</c><00:00:50.659><c> workday</c><00:00:51.140><c> and</c><00:00:51.350><c> be</c>

00:00:51.790 --> 00:00:51.800 align:start position:0%
workday and data outside workday and be
 

00:00:51.800 --> 00:00:54.970 align:start position:0%
workday and data outside workday and be
able<00:00:51.949><c> to</c><00:00:52.579><c> use</c><00:00:53.540><c> them</c><00:00:53.720><c> together</c><00:00:53.870><c> to</c><00:00:54.559><c> perform</c><00:00:54.890><c> the</c>

00:00:54.970 --> 00:00:54.980 align:start position:0%
able to use them together to perform the
 

00:00:54.980 --> 00:01:05.569 align:start position:0%
able to use them together to perform the
tasks<00:00:55.190><c> you</c><00:00:55.309><c> want</c><00:00:55.430><c> to</c><00:00:55.550><c> do</c>

00:01:05.569 --> 00:01:05.579 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:01:05.579 --> 00:01:08.730 align:start position:0%
 
honestly<00:01:06.579><c> I</c><00:01:06.640><c> like</c><00:01:06.820><c> all</c><00:01:07.090><c> of</c><00:01:07.119><c> them</c><00:01:07.240><c> I</c><00:01:08.079><c> want</c><00:01:08.649><c> to</c>

00:01:08.730 --> 00:01:08.740 align:start position:0%
honestly I like all of them I want to
 

00:01:08.740 --> 00:01:10.859 align:start position:0%
honestly I like all of them I want to
learn<00:01:09.670><c> a</c><00:01:09.729><c> little</c><00:01:09.969><c> more</c><00:01:10.210><c> about</c><00:01:10.270><c> functional</c>

00:01:10.859 --> 00:01:10.869 align:start position:0%
learn a little more about functional
 

00:01:10.869 --> 00:01:12.719 align:start position:0%
learn a little more about functional
programming<00:01:11.200><c> so</c><00:01:12.070><c> I</c><00:01:12.100><c> would</c><00:01:12.340><c> go</c><00:01:12.520><c> to</c><00:01:12.579><c> the</c>

00:01:12.719 --> 00:01:12.729 align:start position:0%
programming so I would go to the
 

00:01:12.729 --> 00:01:14.670 align:start position:0%
programming so I would go to the
functional<00:01:13.090><c> programming</c><00:01:13.630><c> talks</c><00:01:13.930><c> but</c>

00:01:14.670 --> 00:01:14.680 align:start position:0%
functional programming talks but
 

00:01:14.680 --> 00:01:15.870 align:start position:0%
functional programming talks but
sometimes<00:01:15.039><c> they</c><00:01:15.130><c> get</c><00:01:15.250><c> a</c><00:01:15.310><c> little</c><00:01:15.430><c> more</c><00:01:15.549><c> too</c>

00:01:15.870 --> 00:01:15.880 align:start position:0%
sometimes they get a little more too
 

00:01:15.880 --> 00:01:17.910 align:start position:0%
sometimes they get a little more too
technical<00:01:16.390><c> and</c><00:01:16.930><c> in</c><00:01:17.079><c> that</c><00:01:17.229><c> case</c><00:01:17.439><c> I</c><00:01:17.619><c> would</c><00:01:17.710><c> go</c><00:01:17.860><c> to</c>

00:01:17.910 --> 00:01:17.920 align:start position:0%
technical and in that case I would go to
 

00:01:17.920 --> 00:01:20.179 align:start position:0%
technical and in that case I would go to
the<00:01:18.130><c> Dana</c><00:01:18.310><c> ones</c><00:01:18.549><c> or</c><00:01:19.119><c> the</c><00:01:19.210><c> microservices</c><00:01:19.780><c> ones</c>

00:01:20.179 --> 00:01:20.189 align:start position:0%
the Dana ones or the microservices ones
 

00:01:20.189 --> 00:01:23.160 align:start position:0%
the Dana ones or the microservices ones
because<00:01:21.189><c> I</c><00:01:21.429><c> think</c><00:01:21.549><c> every</c><00:01:21.909><c> talk</c><00:01:22.149><c> is</c><00:01:22.420><c> sharing</c>

00:01:23.160 --> 00:01:23.170 align:start position:0%
because I think every talk is sharing
 

00:01:23.170 --> 00:01:24.899 align:start position:0%
because I think every talk is sharing
something<00:01:23.409><c> about</c><00:01:24.310><c> what</c><00:01:24.490><c> the</c><00:01:24.549><c> company</c><00:01:24.700><c> is</c>

00:01:24.899 --> 00:01:24.909 align:start position:0%
something about what the company is
 

00:01:24.909 --> 00:01:34.620 align:start position:0%
something about what the company is
doing<00:01:25.030><c> and</c><00:01:25.569><c> they're</c><00:01:25.960><c> all</c><00:01:26.049><c> valuable</c>

00:01:34.620 --> 00:01:34.630 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:01:34.630 --> 00:01:37.469 align:start position:0%
 
I<00:01:34.689><c> am</c><00:01:35.350><c> going</c><00:01:35.649><c> to</c><00:01:35.740><c> write</c><00:01:36.610><c> is</c><00:01:36.729><c> hoping</c><00:01:37.090><c> to</c><00:01:37.149><c> tell</c>

00:01:37.469 --> 00:01:37.479 align:start position:0%
I am going to write is hoping to tell
 

00:01:37.479 --> 00:01:39.959 align:start position:0%
I am going to write is hoping to tell
everyone<00:01:38.079><c> that</c><00:01:38.530><c> you</c><00:01:39.490><c> don't</c><00:01:39.640><c> have</c><00:01:39.789><c> to</c><00:01:39.880><c> be</c>

00:01:39.959 --> 00:01:39.969 align:start position:0%
everyone that you don't have to be
 

00:01:39.969 --> 00:01:42.660 align:start position:0%
everyone that you don't have to be
technical<00:01:40.119><c> in</c><00:01:41.110><c> order</c><00:01:41.469><c> to</c><00:01:41.920><c> derive</c><00:01:42.219><c> insight</c>

00:01:42.660 --> 00:01:42.670 align:start position:0%
technical in order to derive insight
 

00:01:42.670 --> 00:01:45.179 align:start position:0%
technical in order to derive insight
from<00:01:42.820><c> data</c><00:01:43.090><c> there</c><00:01:43.899><c> are</c><00:01:43.930><c> plenty</c><00:01:44.500><c> of</c><00:01:44.680><c> tools</c><00:01:45.070><c> out</c>

00:01:45.179 --> 00:01:45.189 align:start position:0%
from data there are plenty of tools out
 

00:01:45.189 --> 00:01:48.749 align:start position:0%
from data there are plenty of tools out
there<00:01:45.250><c> that</c><00:01:45.930><c> are</c><00:01:46.930><c> already</c><00:01:47.170><c> doing</c><00:01:47.500><c> things</c><00:01:48.490><c> to</c>

00:01:48.749 --> 00:01:48.759 align:start position:0%
there that are already doing things to
 

00:01:48.759 --> 00:01:51.179 align:start position:0%
there that are already doing things to
make<00:01:48.909><c> people's</c><00:01:49.509><c> life</c><00:01:49.600><c> easier</c><00:01:49.960><c> in</c><00:01:50.259><c> Mongolia</c>

00:01:51.179 --> 00:01:51.189 align:start position:0%
make people's life easier in Mongolia
 

00:01:51.189 --> 00:01:52.649 align:start position:0%
make people's life easier in Mongolia
data<00:01:51.369><c> you</c><00:01:51.880><c> don't</c><00:01:51.970><c> have</c><00:01:52.149><c> to</c><00:01:52.299><c> do</c><00:01:52.420><c> anything</c>

00:01:52.649 --> 00:01:52.659 align:start position:0%
data you don't have to do anything
 

00:01:52.659 --> 00:01:54.300 align:start position:0%
data you don't have to do anything
yourself<00:01:53.009><c> leverage</c><00:01:54.009><c> the</c><00:01:54.220><c> existing</c>

00:01:54.300 --> 00:01:54.310 align:start position:0%
yourself leverage the existing
 

00:01:54.310 --> 00:01:57.240 align:start position:0%
yourself leverage the existing
frameworks<00:01:55.179><c> that</c><00:01:55.270><c> stay</c><00:01:55.569><c> out</c><00:01:55.659><c> there</c><00:01:55.840><c> and</c><00:01:56.250><c> let</c>

00:01:57.240 --> 00:01:57.250 align:start position:0%
frameworks that stay out there and let
 

00:01:57.250 --> 00:02:09.240 align:start position:0%
frameworks that stay out there and let
them<00:01:57.429><c> do</c><00:01:58.119><c> something</c><00:01:58.450><c> work</c><00:01:58.539><c> for</c><00:01:58.750><c> you</c><00:02:07.860><c> I've</c><00:02:08.860><c> been</c>

00:02:09.240 --> 00:02:09.250 align:start position:0%
them do something work for you I've been
 

00:02:09.250 --> 00:02:11.009 align:start position:0%
them do something work for you I've been
looking<00:02:09.580><c> around</c><00:02:09.700><c> basically</c><00:02:10.269><c> for</c><00:02:10.569><c> like</c><00:02:10.840><c> a</c>

00:02:11.009 --> 00:02:11.019 align:start position:0%
looking around basically for like a
 

00:02:11.019 --> 00:02:13.890 align:start position:0%
looking around basically for like a
survey<00:02:11.470><c> of</c><00:02:11.650><c> all</c><00:02:12.430><c> the</c><00:02:12.940><c> technologies</c><00:02:13.540><c> that</c><00:02:13.569><c> are</c>

00:02:13.890 --> 00:02:13.900 align:start position:0%
survey of all the technologies that are
 

00:02:13.900 --> 00:02:17.339 align:start position:0%
survey of all the technologies that are
being<00:02:14.260><c> used</c><00:02:15.220><c> by</c><00:02:15.430><c> people</c><00:02:15.489><c> to</c><00:02:16.360><c> build</c><00:02:16.959><c> their</c><00:02:17.140><c> data</c>

00:02:17.339 --> 00:02:17.349 align:start position:0%
being used by people to build their data
 

00:02:17.349 --> 00:02:20.550 align:start position:0%
being used by people to build their data
pipelines<00:02:17.769><c> whether</c><00:02:18.670><c> it</c><00:02:19.000><c> is</c><00:02:19.180><c> spark</c><00:02:19.780><c> or</c><00:02:20.110><c> Apache</c>

00:02:20.550 --> 00:02:20.560 align:start position:0%
pipelines whether it is spark or Apache
 

00:02:20.560 --> 00:02:22.320 align:start position:0%
pipelines whether it is spark or Apache
being<00:02:20.920><c> data</c><00:02:21.489><c> flow</c><00:02:21.730><c> flink</c>

00:02:22.320 --> 00:02:22.330 align:start position:0%
being data flow flink
 

00:02:22.330 --> 00:02:25.800 align:start position:0%
being data flow flink
Samsa<00:02:23.700><c> basically</c><00:02:24.700><c> trying</c><00:02:24.940><c> to</c><00:02:25.120><c> get</c><00:02:25.360><c> a</c><00:02:25.390><c> sense</c><00:02:25.630><c> of</c>

00:02:25.800 --> 00:02:25.810 align:start position:0%
Samsa basically trying to get a sense of
 

00:02:25.810 --> 00:02:27.630 align:start position:0%
Samsa basically trying to get a sense of
what<00:02:26.200><c> people</c><00:02:26.230><c> are</c><00:02:26.709><c> saying</c><00:02:26.980><c> about</c><00:02:27.130><c> these</c><00:02:27.400><c> of</c>

00:02:27.630 --> 00:02:27.640 align:start position:0%
what people are saying about these of
 

00:02:27.640 --> 00:02:29.339 align:start position:0%
what people are saying about these of
these<00:02:27.940><c> different</c><00:02:28.390><c> technologies</c><00:02:29.049><c> and</c>

00:02:29.339 --> 00:02:29.349 align:start position:0%
these different technologies and
 

00:02:29.349 --> 00:02:32.460 align:start position:0%
these different technologies and
possibly<00:02:30.190><c> use</c><00:02:30.549><c> them</c><00:02:30.790><c> in</c><00:02:31.239><c> our</c><00:02:31.840><c> day-to-day</c><00:02:32.079><c> work</c>

00:02:32.460 --> 00:02:32.470 align:start position:0%
possibly use them in our day-to-day work
 

00:02:32.470 --> 00:02:44.440 align:start position:0%
possibly use them in our day-to-day work
as<00:02:32.590><c> well</c>

00:02:44.440 --> 00:02:44.450 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:02:44.450 --> 00:02:46.440 align:start position:0%
 
are<00:02:44.990><c> you</c><00:02:45.080><c> a</c><00:02:45.170><c> scholar</c><00:02:45.410><c> at</c><00:02:45.560><c> work</c><00:02:45.709><c> everyday</c><00:02:46.069><c> I</c>

00:02:46.440 --> 00:02:46.450 align:start position:0%
are you a scholar at work everyday I
 

00:02:46.450 --> 00:02:48.550 align:start position:0%
are you a scholar at work everyday I
like<00:02:47.450><c> the</c><00:02:47.569><c> language</c><00:02:47.720><c> I</c><00:02:48.170><c> like</c><00:02:48.440><c> this</c>

00:02:48.550 --> 00:02:48.560 align:start position:0%
like the language I like this
 

00:02:48.560 --> 00:02:51.100 align:start position:0%
like the language I like this
flexibility<00:02:49.190><c> where</c><00:02:50.000><c> you</c><00:02:50.180><c> can</c><00:02:50.360><c> be</c><00:02:50.660><c> functional</c>

00:02:51.100 --> 00:02:51.110 align:start position:0%
flexibility where you can be functional
 

00:02:51.110 --> 00:02:53.199 align:start position:0%
flexibility where you can be functional
if<00:02:51.200><c> you</c><00:02:51.290><c> want</c><00:02:51.530><c> but</c><00:02:52.220><c> when</c><00:02:52.400><c> you</c><00:02:52.489><c> need</c><00:02:52.670><c> to</c><00:02:52.700><c> do</c><00:02:52.880><c> more</c>

00:02:53.199 --> 00:02:53.209 align:start position:0%
if you want but when you need to do more
 

00:02:53.209 --> 00:02:55.330 align:start position:0%
if you want but when you need to do more
imperative<00:02:53.630><c> things</c><00:02:53.989><c> you</c><00:02:54.140><c> can</c><00:02:54.290><c> drop</c><00:02:54.500><c> down</c><00:02:54.680><c> to</c>

00:02:55.330 --> 00:02:55.340 align:start position:0%
imperative things you can drop down to
 

00:02:55.340 --> 00:02:58.300 align:start position:0%
imperative things you can drop down to
use<00:02:55.910><c> those</c><00:02:56.150><c> features</c><00:02:56.360><c> as</c><00:02:56.690><c> well</c><00:02:56.890><c> so</c><00:02:57.890><c> I</c><00:02:57.920><c> think</c><00:02:58.040><c> is</c>

00:02:58.300 --> 00:02:58.310 align:start position:0%
use those features as well so I think is
 

00:02:58.310 --> 00:03:00.160 align:start position:0%
use those features as well so I think is
a<00:02:58.340><c> very</c><00:02:58.640><c> good</c><00:02:58.760><c> balance</c><00:02:59.209><c> between</c><00:02:59.330><c> performance</c>

00:03:00.160 --> 00:03:00.170 align:start position:0%
a very good balance between performance
 

00:03:00.170 --> 00:03:05.620 align:start position:0%
a very good balance between performance
and<00:03:00.590><c> also</c><00:03:01.150><c> good</c><00:03:02.150><c> styling</c><00:03:02.630><c> and</c><00:03:03.459><c> I</c><00:03:04.459><c> think</c><00:03:04.880><c> I</c><00:03:05.300><c> will</c>

00:03:05.620 --> 00:03:05.630 align:start position:0%
and also good styling and I think I will
 

00:03:05.630 --> 00:03:08.050 align:start position:0%
and also good styling and I think I will
see<00:03:05.840><c> myself</c><00:03:06.470><c> using</c><00:03:07.130><c> that</c><00:03:07.459><c> in</c><00:03:07.610><c> the</c><00:03:07.670><c> years</c><00:03:07.850><c> going</c>

00:03:08.050 --> 00:03:08.060 align:start position:0%
see myself using that in the years going
 

00:03:08.060 --> 00:03:19.000 align:start position:0%
see myself using that in the years going
forward<00:03:08.300><c> as</c><00:03:08.510><c> well</c>

00:03:19.000 --> 00:03:19.010 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:03:19.010 --> 00:03:20.949 align:start position:0%
 
I've<00:03:19.790><c> been</c><00:03:19.939><c> loving</c><00:03:20.239><c> the</c><00:03:20.360><c> panelists</c>

00:03:20.949 --> 00:03:20.959 align:start position:0%
I've been loving the panelists
 

00:03:20.959 --> 00:03:24.069 align:start position:0%
I've been loving the panelists
discussions<00:03:21.879><c> because</c><00:03:22.879><c> seems</c><00:03:23.810><c> like</c><00:03:23.959><c> it</c>

00:03:24.069 --> 00:03:24.079 align:start position:0%
discussions because seems like it
 

00:03:24.079 --> 00:03:25.449 align:start position:0%
discussions because seems like it
already<00:03:24.349><c> have</c><00:03:24.470><c> a</c><00:03:24.500><c> script</c><00:03:24.769><c> and</c><00:03:25.099><c> they</c><00:03:25.280><c> would</c>

00:03:25.449 --> 00:03:25.459 align:start position:0%
already have a script and they would
 

00:03:25.459 --> 00:03:28.330 align:start position:0%
already have a script and they would
just<00:03:25.790><c> sometimes</c><00:03:26.780><c> have</c><00:03:27.170><c> opposing</c><00:03:28.069><c> ideologies</c>

00:03:28.330 --> 00:03:28.340 align:start position:0%
just sometimes have opposing ideologies
 

00:03:28.340 --> 00:03:30.009 align:start position:0%
just sometimes have opposing ideologies
then<00:03:28.879><c> I</c><00:03:28.970><c> would</c><00:03:29.120><c> throw</c><00:03:29.269><c> jabs</c><00:03:29.569><c> at</c><00:03:29.780><c> each</c><00:03:29.810><c> other</c>

00:03:30.009 --> 00:03:30.019 align:start position:0%
then I would throw jabs at each other
 

00:03:30.019 --> 00:03:32.860 align:start position:0%
then I would throw jabs at each other
and<00:03:30.370><c> it's</c><00:03:31.370><c> been</c><00:03:31.549><c> entertaining</c><00:03:31.970><c> to</c><00:03:32.510><c> see</c><00:03:32.659><c> them</c>

00:03:32.860 --> 00:03:32.870 align:start position:0%
and it's been entertaining to see them
 

00:03:32.870 --> 00:03:35.440 align:start position:0%
and it's been entertaining to see them
bring<00:03:33.590><c> up</c><00:03:33.739><c> both</c><00:03:34.189><c> the</c><00:03:34.370><c> good</c><00:03:34.549><c> and</c><00:03:34.579><c> bad</c><00:03:34.970><c> parts</c><00:03:35.239><c> of</c>

00:03:35.440 --> 00:03:35.450 align:start position:0%
bring up both the good and bad parts of
 

00:03:35.450 --> 00:03:37.569 align:start position:0%
bring up both the good and bad parts of
functional<00:03:36.260><c> programming</c><00:03:36.290><c> and</c><00:03:37.010><c> sometimes</c>

00:03:37.569 --> 00:03:37.579 align:start position:0%
functional programming and sometimes
 

00:03:37.579 --> 00:03:38.800 align:start position:0%
functional programming and sometimes
even<00:03:37.700><c> imperative</c><00:03:38.120><c> programming</c><00:03:38.480><c> and</c><00:03:38.780><c> just</c>

00:03:38.800 --> 00:03:38.810 align:start position:0%
even imperative programming and just
 

00:03:38.810 --> 00:03:41.369 align:start position:0%
even imperative programming and just
have<00:03:39.650><c> people</c><00:03:39.920><c> talking</c><00:03:40.340><c> candidly</c><00:03:40.909><c> about</c>

00:03:41.369 --> 00:03:41.379 align:start position:0%
have people talking candidly about
 

00:03:41.379 --> 00:03:44.770 align:start position:0%
have people talking candidly about
what's<00:03:42.379><c> good</c><00:03:42.859><c> about</c><00:03:42.950><c> and</c><00:03:43.310><c> what</c><00:03:44.209><c> it's</c><00:03:44.359><c> still</c>

00:03:44.770 --> 00:03:44.780 align:start position:0%
what's good about and what it's still
 

00:03:44.780 --> 00:03:58.020 align:start position:0%
what's good about and what it's still
need<00:03:44.989><c> to</c><00:03:45.049><c> work</c><00:03:45.200><c> on</c>

00:03:58.020 --> 00:03:58.030 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:03:58.030 --> 00:04:00.090 align:start position:0%
 
you